The Myth of the Oil Crisis by Robin M. Mills
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:08 pm
Hi,
My name is Joe Kelley. I think that it is important to introduce myself at the beginning of this book discussion because of the importance of the topic and how I am involved in it.
I have worked on this subject matter steadily for over a decade with some success; perhaps even more than some success, possibly: very significant breakthroughs in accurate perception. I have managed to boil down the entire economic/political (divided by) perspective into a one sentence base camp; from which any puzzle can be moved under this lens so as to be deciphered.
My introduction includes an economic/political viewpoint or measure of reality offered as a concise and understandable sentence; I call this way of measuring economic/political reality: Joe’s Law (because no one else has yet to own up to this way of measuring economic/political reality).
Joes Law:
Power produced into a state of oversupply will reduce the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
The book titled The Myth of the Oil Crisis will be discussed by me from a Joe’s Law perspective, and the reader may be asking why – or perhaps not?
I’m telling anyway.
Oil is a form of currency. Oil currency contains actual power. Someone who has control of oil currency, with its self contained power, has the power to purchase other currencies, so long as the controller of oil power controls oil power.
As soon as the controller of oil power no longer has control of oil power is as soon as that controller is powerless – by that exact measure.
This is significant news, even more significant than news concerning the power to control other forms of currency such as, say, The Dollar, which as a legal form of currency and a form of currency that has no self-contained power, all the power to purchase with legal paper (and digital) currency depends upon another power, a power other than the paper power or the digital power which is held, owned, or controlled by the current owners of legal currency (promises to pay).
Why present a book discussion in this way, one might ask, or one might prefer to just read, and not ask anything, just read.
If the object in view is entertainment, to just read, and not ask questions, to merely be subject to the medium, then I’m going to offer those readers a bone. I’m going to link something I found in my working on this topic, and I hope the reader who is seeking entertainment will appreciate the link wholeheartedly – as I did. For me it was akin to comic relief, and I’ll explain why as time goes by – perhaps.
Here is the comic relief (and vital for understanding my angle of view on the book being tabled):
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-52676 ... 741878159#
I think of this effort more like a round table discussion between fellow human beings who have a great interest in knowing the truth about significant current events, so as to be better prepared to deal with those events, to survive, and to survive well, not simply as an individual, not simply as a family, but more importantly to survive and survive well as a species.
What could be more important than entertainment? To those who have time, and energy, power - really, to those who have power I speak now.
I present my side of this Oil story before offering my angle of view on the book, so as not to appear like someone who criticizes, or argues, for the sake of argument. My angle on this is not specious, shallow, or without power, not powerless.
Two more links, a few more comments, and then on to a specific reference to the book.
Link A and B are twins, two studies that are powerful on their own, but the two studies together combine to bring into view a much more powerful understanding, not an epiphany, perhaps, a slower realization of actual reality.
http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-hitler.html
reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshe ... index.html
Investing in destruction is a powerful but risky venture; the costs must be borne by the intended victims completely for the return on the investment to be realized fully, completely, and without any reduction in personal power.
Again, the realization may arrive slowly, not suddenly, so my effort to present my side of this view can proceed without dwelling to much on the individual parts. Please know at this point of a deal made between Standard Oil of New Jersey and I.G. Farben of Germany before and during the build up to the horrible thing that was later called The Second World War. That deal passed on the rights to produce synthetic oil exclusively to Germany.
Germany could not have executed their part in that war without oil power. Germany had to import all oil power, or make it at home. Germany made oil at home.
Synthetic oil was made in Germany, economically, in large quantities, fueling their military power, and that was done in the mid 20th century, here on earth.
From the book "The Myth of the Oil Crisis" I can pull an abbreviation now.
EROEI
Energy return on energy invested; the energy yielded by a process divided by the energy consumed.
Keep that in mind, please, as this part (my part) of this book discussion progresses. It was said by someone, in my reading, I’ve lost the link to it, that the German methods of “cracking” the synthetic oil puzzle was made profitable by subsidizing slave labor – otherwise the power required far exceeded the power produced. In other words the “profit” of synthetic oil was gained at the expense of specific people.
Here is something I made sure of keeping close at hand:
Power produced into a state of oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
Economy is to politics like oil power is to military power. I can break that down even simpler, using Joe’s law. Economy is to physical power as politics is to psychological power.
Economy/Politics
EROEI
Energy return on energy invested; the energy yielded by a process divided by the energy consumed.
The quote about “Nazi morality” and how the Political Police (the past versions, SS, KGB, and now the current versions like The CIA, Mossad, MI6), how the Political Police were out done in cruelty by the corporate police (lower case = not officially existing) can be found in this book:
amazon.com/Crime-Punishment-I-G-Farben/ ... 0029046300
Again, back to the base camp, please:
Power produced into a state of oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
Answer this (before I offer a viable answer - or clue - or piece of the puzzle):
Why do reasonable people destroy power production devices regularly, as if on a schedule?
If you think the question is way out there, something some nut job would ask, then I’m aghast, dumfounded, as to why you are reading this at all, please return to whatever entertains you.
Example:
War making planners, the bosses, decide to target power plants during their war making ventures.
The answer could be obvious.
Please link the answer to the present discussion of a book.
The book title:
The Myth of the Oil Crisis
What is the purpose behind destruction of power producing devices?
Let me loan out my brain to the curious ones at this table. A pretend Oil Crisis is not a real Oil Crisis unless the pretense gains currency, is believed, and is bought (hook , line , and sinker?), like the Brooklyn Bridge fire sale.
Why decide to employ an Oil Crisis and why not decide to employ a dollar crisis?
Are the gears turning?
Economic/Political
What is the purpose behind destruction of power producing devices?
Borrow Joe’s law again:
Power produced into a state of oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
Suppose you have a lot of friends and I’m in that bunch, fantasies can be instructive, and now suppose that one of us invents a method of producing a whole lot of power at a very low cost, and suppose that the device is very easy and cheap to build, and suppose that the device can spread like wildfire among or friends so at to make all our friends more and more powerful in a very short time.
What happens?
I’ll return to this discussion on this book alone or with some powerful help later.
My name is Joe Kelley. I think that it is important to introduce myself at the beginning of this book discussion because of the importance of the topic and how I am involved in it.
I have worked on this subject matter steadily for over a decade with some success; perhaps even more than some success, possibly: very significant breakthroughs in accurate perception. I have managed to boil down the entire economic/political (divided by) perspective into a one sentence base camp; from which any puzzle can be moved under this lens so as to be deciphered.
My introduction includes an economic/political viewpoint or measure of reality offered as a concise and understandable sentence; I call this way of measuring economic/political reality: Joe’s Law (because no one else has yet to own up to this way of measuring economic/political reality).
Joes Law:
Power produced into a state of oversupply will reduce the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
The book titled The Myth of the Oil Crisis will be discussed by me from a Joe’s Law perspective, and the reader may be asking why – or perhaps not?
I’m telling anyway.
Oil is a form of currency. Oil currency contains actual power. Someone who has control of oil currency, with its self contained power, has the power to purchase other currencies, so long as the controller of oil power controls oil power.
As soon as the controller of oil power no longer has control of oil power is as soon as that controller is powerless – by that exact measure.
This is significant news, even more significant than news concerning the power to control other forms of currency such as, say, The Dollar, which as a legal form of currency and a form of currency that has no self-contained power, all the power to purchase with legal paper (and digital) currency depends upon another power, a power other than the paper power or the digital power which is held, owned, or controlled by the current owners of legal currency (promises to pay).
Why present a book discussion in this way, one might ask, or one might prefer to just read, and not ask anything, just read.
If the object in view is entertainment, to just read, and not ask questions, to merely be subject to the medium, then I’m going to offer those readers a bone. I’m going to link something I found in my working on this topic, and I hope the reader who is seeking entertainment will appreciate the link wholeheartedly – as I did. For me it was akin to comic relief, and I’ll explain why as time goes by – perhaps.
Here is the comic relief (and vital for understanding my angle of view on the book being tabled):
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-52676 ... 741878159#
I think of this effort more like a round table discussion between fellow human beings who have a great interest in knowing the truth about significant current events, so as to be better prepared to deal with those events, to survive, and to survive well, not simply as an individual, not simply as a family, but more importantly to survive and survive well as a species.
What could be more important than entertainment? To those who have time, and energy, power - really, to those who have power I speak now.
I present my side of this Oil story before offering my angle of view on the book, so as not to appear like someone who criticizes, or argues, for the sake of argument. My angle on this is not specious, shallow, or without power, not powerless.
Two more links, a few more comments, and then on to a specific reference to the book.
Link A and B are twins, two studies that are powerful on their own, but the two studies together combine to bring into view a much more powerful understanding, not an epiphany, perhaps, a slower realization of actual reality.
http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-hitler.html
reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshe ... index.html
Investing in destruction is a powerful but risky venture; the costs must be borne by the intended victims completely for the return on the investment to be realized fully, completely, and without any reduction in personal power.
Again, the realization may arrive slowly, not suddenly, so my effort to present my side of this view can proceed without dwelling to much on the individual parts. Please know at this point of a deal made between Standard Oil of New Jersey and I.G. Farben of Germany before and during the build up to the horrible thing that was later called The Second World War. That deal passed on the rights to produce synthetic oil exclusively to Germany.
Germany could not have executed their part in that war without oil power. Germany had to import all oil power, or make it at home. Germany made oil at home.
Synthetic oil was made in Germany, economically, in large quantities, fueling their military power, and that was done in the mid 20th century, here on earth.
From the book "The Myth of the Oil Crisis" I can pull an abbreviation now.
EROEI
Energy return on energy invested; the energy yielded by a process divided by the energy consumed.
Keep that in mind, please, as this part (my part) of this book discussion progresses. It was said by someone, in my reading, I’ve lost the link to it, that the German methods of “cracking” the synthetic oil puzzle was made profitable by subsidizing slave labor – otherwise the power required far exceeded the power produced. In other words the “profit” of synthetic oil was gained at the expense of specific people.
Here is something I made sure of keeping close at hand:
Adding the following from the same source:“The construction of I.G. Auschwitz has assured I.G. a unique place in business history. By adopting the theory and practice of Nazi morality, it was able to depart from the conventional economics of slavery in which slaves are traditionally treated as capital equipment to be maintained and serviced for optimum use and depreciated over a normal life span. Instead, I.G. reduced slave labor to a consumable raw material, a human ore from which the mineral of life was systematically extracted. When no usable energy remained, the living dross was shipped to the gassing chambers and cremation furnaces of the extermination center at Birkenau, where the S.S. recycled it into the German war economy – gold teeth for the Reichsbank, hair for mattresses, and fat for soap. Even the moans of the doomed became a work incentive, exhorting the remaining inmates to greater effort.”
The reader may not be totally confused as to what my angle on this book is all about and to those who may be in that powerless state I offer a return to base camp.“Conditions were such that sickness was a pervasive fact of life among the inhabitants of Monowitz. The hospital wards built by I.G. were so inadequate that even the S.S. suggested additional wards be built. I.G. refused because of the cost.”
Power produced into a state of oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
Economy is to politics like oil power is to military power. I can break that down even simpler, using Joe’s law. Economy is to physical power as politics is to psychological power.
Economy/Politics
EROEI
Energy return on energy invested; the energy yielded by a process divided by the energy consumed.
The quote about “Nazi morality” and how the Political Police (the past versions, SS, KGB, and now the current versions like The CIA, Mossad, MI6), how the Political Police were out done in cruelty by the corporate police (lower case = not officially existing) can be found in this book:
amazon.com/Crime-Punishment-I-G-Farben/ ... 0029046300
Again, back to the base camp, please:
Power produced into a state of oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
Answer this (before I offer a viable answer - or clue - or piece of the puzzle):
Why do reasonable people destroy power production devices regularly, as if on a schedule?
If you think the question is way out there, something some nut job would ask, then I’m aghast, dumfounded, as to why you are reading this at all, please return to whatever entertains you.
Example:
War making planners, the bosses, decide to target power plants during their war making ventures.
The answer could be obvious.
Please link the answer to the present discussion of a book.
The book title:
The Myth of the Oil Crisis
What is the purpose behind destruction of power producing devices?
Let me loan out my brain to the curious ones at this table. A pretend Oil Crisis is not a real Oil Crisis unless the pretense gains currency, is believed, and is bought (hook , line , and sinker?), like the Brooklyn Bridge fire sale.
Why decide to employ an Oil Crisis and why not decide to employ a dollar crisis?
Are the gears turning?
Economic/Political
What is the purpose behind destruction of power producing devices?
Borrow Joe’s law again:
Power produced into a state of oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
Suppose you have a lot of friends and I’m in that bunch, fantasies can be instructive, and now suppose that one of us invents a method of producing a whole lot of power at a very low cost, and suppose that the device is very easy and cheap to build, and suppose that the device can spread like wildfire among or friends so at to make all our friends more and more powerful in a very short time.
What happens?
I’ll return to this discussion on this book alone or with some powerful help later.