![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=NSQNSlUUoOc
In total there are 18 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 17 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 871 on Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:00 am
Sorry, I think comparing a scream to rally support to someone zeroing on a one specific religion is a bit off Mad. And if he IS pandering to a specific mind(less)set, that is even more reason to distrust him IMO.MadArchitect wrote: Over the holiday I was reviewing the whole Howard Dean fiasco and was dismayed to recall how such a petty, insignificant episode sold his whole bid short. Surely we don't have to be that ridiculous.
The incidents are different, yeah, sure. That isn't my point. My point is that American politics is distorted and short-changed by people's willingness to judge the candidates on single enchanges viewed with no sense of context.Mr. Pessimistic wrote:Sorry, I think comparing a scream to rally support to someone zeroing on a one specific religion is a bit off Mad.
Sure, I'd agree with that. Now point me to a politician that doesn't do the same thing. That's what passes for campaigning, and I don't see any reason to level particular blame at Huckabee. He's playing the game. I don't like it, but it's the same game being played by all the candidates, so I'm not sure there's anything to be done about it.And if he IS pandering to a specific mind(less)set, that is even more reason to distrust him IMO.
His position on what? The question has nothing to do with his politics. He was asked how he accounts for a surge in support, and he basically did the same thing that half of all baseball players do when they cross home plate -- thanked God. Personally, I don't see how this is cause for concern.This is not a bad clip on Huckabee caught in emotion, it is his position and he is speaking very clearly and from the heart.
Penelope, what exactly do you mean by "like it or not, the result is going to effect us," if you don't mind me asking?Penelope wrote:Here in the UK, some of us are watching your elections with great interest, because, like it or not, the result is going to effect us.
Mr. P. it's pretty common for candidates to focus their talking points to their audience. I don't think that's a terribly distrustful practice. If I went to hear a candidate speak, I wouldn't want to hear her talking about, say, unions, so I wouldn't go to a speech that targeted a union audience. A candidate, or politician for that matter, hell any public speaker if she's good, is only going to hit a handful of major talking points in any one speech. That the audience knows what those talking points are ahead of time helps audiences to see candidates they want to see, talk about issues they want to hear about.Mr.P. wrote:And if he IS pandering to a specific mind(less)set, that is even more reason to distrust him IMO.
Come now, Mad, outside of whatever religious rant the above YouTube segment contains (I haven't watched it), Huckabee is a loon. While running for a Senate seat, he advocated halting federal funding on AIDS research and proposed, in the alternative, quarantining people infected with AIDS. Granted that was back in the 90s when the right still defended the notion that AIDS was the gay-man's virus and gay men could transfer it to the innocent population just by looking at them with impure thoughts. But, to this day, he hasn't fully distanced himself from those statements.Mad wrote:What is cause for concern is how little Huckabee seems to know about foreign policy. But no one's talking about that. They're all to hung up on his religious background.