Wasn't Dave Barry in that too? He's a humor writer out of Miami.Truewest: "The Rock Bottom Remainders" are a really bad rock band. Amy Tan and Stephen King are members.
-
In total there are 26 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 26 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 871 on Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:00 am
Stephen King: Twilight Author "Can't Write Worth a Darn
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
- geo
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
- 15
- Location: NC
- Has thanked: 2200 times
- Been thanked: 2201 times
I've been meaning to comment on this because there's something ironic here.
Stephen King, too, has been criticized as not "literary" worthy. When he received the National Book Foundation's Medal for Distinguished Contribution to American Letters in 2003, book critic Harold Bloom was widely quoted as saying it was "another low in the process of dumbing down our cultural life."
J.K. Rowling has frequently been on the receiving end of similar criticism for being a woefully inadequate writer. So it seems elitism is alive and well in America. There is a very clear pecking order at work here and Stephen King is letting everyone know that he is, at least, better than Stephenie Meyer.
I think these critics fail to take into account a very important distinction between writing ability and sales data. Through sheer selling ability J.K. Rowling, Stephenie Meyer, and, yes, Stephen King, have way more literary cachet than they probably deserve. So what. They have succeeded in finding audiences. I'm inclined to cut Stephen King some slack. Probably they caught him on a bad day. I also happen to think he's he's a darned good writer.
Stephen King, too, has been criticized as not "literary" worthy. When he received the National Book Foundation's Medal for Distinguished Contribution to American Letters in 2003, book critic Harold Bloom was widely quoted as saying it was "another low in the process of dumbing down our cultural life."
J.K. Rowling has frequently been on the receiving end of similar criticism for being a woefully inadequate writer. So it seems elitism is alive and well in America. There is a very clear pecking order at work here and Stephen King is letting everyone know that he is, at least, better than Stephenie Meyer.
I think these critics fail to take into account a very important distinction between writing ability and sales data. Through sheer selling ability J.K. Rowling, Stephenie Meyer, and, yes, Stephen King, have way more literary cachet than they probably deserve. So what. They have succeeded in finding audiences. I'm inclined to cut Stephen King some slack. Probably they caught him on a bad day. I also happen to think he's he's a darned good writer.
-Geo
Question everything
Question everything
- Suzanne
-
- Book General
- Posts: 2513
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:51 pm
- 15
- Location: New Jersey
- Has thanked: 518 times
- Been thanked: 399 times
Rock Bottom Remainders
Truewest wrote:
Get out of town! Had no clue, thanks."The Rock Bottom Remainders" are a really bad rock band. Amy Tan and Stephen King are members.
- uod_sa_libro
-
Experienced
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:09 am
- 15
- Location: Cagayan de Oro City
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
I read this one article on the net about JK Rowling's HP and there was one old dude, I've forgotten his name now, but he was said to be a famous tongue-lashing literary critic. He said the Harry Potter series was "ungrammatical...It gave me a headache." or something like that. Woah....geo wrote:J.K. Rowling has frequently been on the receiving end of similar criticism for being a woefully inadequate writer.
I'm inclined to cut Stephen King some slack. Probably they caught him on a bad day. I also happen to think he's he's a darned good writer.
I think Stephen King's an amazing writer, too.
------------------------------
Right here, right now.
- Wolf
-
-
Float like a butterfly, post like a bee!
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 10:58 am
- 15
- Location: PA
Try to be open minded and it is trying to be open minded.
It seemed like all writers have to go through some kind of a hazing by being considered hacks before their sixth or eight novel.
Even though I do not like Twilight myself, it seemed Meyer put a lot of effort in 'them lotta pages.' She wrote like four books before anyone heard of her, good or bad. It makes me curious to see why Stephen King does not like it.
I tend to be a fan of stories that truely shows the darkness in one's heart like Lord of the Flies, The Painted Bird, and the small minded petty evils in Salemn's Lot.
Even though I do not like Twilight myself, it seemed Meyer put a lot of effort in 'them lotta pages.' She wrote like four books before anyone heard of her, good or bad. It makes me curious to see why Stephen King does not like it.
I tend to be a fan of stories that truely shows the darkness in one's heart like Lord of the Flies, The Painted Bird, and the small minded petty evils in Salemn's Lot.
- Suzanne
-
- Book General
- Posts: 2513
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:51 pm
- 15
- Location: New Jersey
- Has thanked: 518 times
- Been thanked: 399 times
Steven King
I remember reading "Salems Lot", I love vampires and this was my introduction to Steven King. The vamps in "Salems Lot" were scary, ugly creatures. Anne Rice turned the vamps into more relatable creatures. I have to confess, I loved some of her earlier Vampire Chronicle novels. I felt sorry for the poor humans. Maybe King doesn't like the idea that vampires have now become more humanish. We can see it in "Twilight" and also the HBO show "True Blood". I am looking forward to the new season.
Steven King is a true horror writer. I don't know if "Twilight" could be called a true horror novel. Stephenie Meyer is not in the same catagory as King maybe he was just defending his genre.
Steven King is a true horror writer. I don't know if "Twilight" could be called a true horror novel. Stephenie Meyer is not in the same catagory as King maybe he was just defending his genre.
-
-
Float like a butterfly, post like a bee!
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 10:58 am
- 15
- Location: PA
Yes, that the difference between real horror and vampire romance novel. The characters in Salemn Lot's, they were beautifully drawn in details, their small little evils, corruptions, and sins, violence and brutally toward each other, it was as if they were preparing the town for the coming of the head vampire who was pure evil. The vampire himself did not come shambling until halfway through the book. There was nothing romantic about these grotesque creatures for they are the undead. They even perverted the concept of Catholic religion when the head vampire made the priest drink blood from his chest. The scariest thing was not the vampires but the corruption of small town folks with monsterous secrets.
Both movies can not do justice to what Stephen King did. He evoked real blood churdling horror about vampires while Meyer only wrote a vampire romance epic.
I forgot to add that Stephen King was not really sexist when he derided Meyer. He is a rabid fan of Shirley Jackson and often used her writings as a example of perfect paragraphs like the beginning of The Haunting of Hill House.
Both movies can not do justice to what Stephen King did. He evoked real blood churdling horror about vampires while Meyer only wrote a vampire romance epic.
I forgot to add that Stephen King was not really sexist when he derided Meyer. He is a rabid fan of Shirley Jackson and often used her writings as a example of perfect paragraphs like the beginning of The Haunting of Hill House.