I know that website. It doesn't produce what you all claim that it produce. If you were honest, then you would admit it. To claim that that website proves evolution, is the same as to claim that bible proves god. I want someone here to tell me that he went to that article, read it, and understood ho...

Here's another head-scratcher: you are missing my point... you can arrange all the human made products also in a similar tree, it doesn't mean that they have evolved by random processes. You have a bicycle, then a motorbike, a car, a truck, an airplane. You have iphone 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.. The fact th...

"You are strangely fixated on the amount of information in DNA. But evolution is all about improving an organism's chances of survival and ability to procreate (pass its genes down to the next generation). Furthermore an organism's long-term survival often hinges on its ability to adjust to dif...

"Consider if the original 700 MB of DNA data never changed, it would remain static and no new information or complexity could arise. However genes (allele frequencies) do change in a population over time. This introduces new information and complexity. These changes interact with the environmen...

LevV, why did you write a post on misconsenptions (sic) about evolution? We all know what is the theory of evolution about, no one here is making any misconsemptions(sic). That's weird, because when I asked "How do you define evolution?" You responded with the following. That's the funny ...

<t>LevV, why did you write a post on misconsenptions about evolution? We all know what is the theory of evolution about, no one here is making any misconsemptions.<br/> <br/> And by the way why did the evolutionists have distanced themselves from the origin of the first cell? Why isn't it also their...

Not a conspiracy, but a human stupidity and the will to believe in myths. The scientific establishment is no different than the church establishment. The scientists are the same priests, only in new dressing. Honest question, what books, if any, have you read on the subject? Since you bothered to w...

I don't like the term "microevolution" because it leaves the door open for "macroevolution". It's a fact that we can breed different types of dogs, so it will be very stupid on my part not to believe in that. My point is that there is no reason to think that the evolution mechani...

<t>1. "A couple of thoughts. You don't actually explain anything here. Your "argument" actually looks like something out of the Holocaust deniers handbook. As Michael Shermer has written, history relies on the same kinds of scientific methods as paleontology and archaeology. Some people deny that th...

<t>1. "The other 98% is also what makes us human; all of it constitutes our evolution. What accounts for our genome as well as that of a goldfish? Time and natural selection. "<br/> Look at my Harry Potter books example. Just because two Harry Potter books are 99% identical, doesn't explain how a sp...