In Chapter 11, The Criminals Chase the Police, of The Man Who Was Thursday, Inspector Ratcliffe argues that anarchy is more desired by the rich than by the poor. His reasoning is that while, “The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all.”
Is this a reasonable position to defend?
-
In total there are 3 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 3 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1000 on Sun Jun 30, 2024 12:23 am
Chapter 11 discussion, "...the rich have always objected to being governed at all."all
- stahrwe
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4898
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:26 am
- 14
- Location: Florida
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Chapter 11 discussion, "...the rich have always objected to being governed at all."all
n=Infinity
Sum n = -1/12
n=1
where n are natural numbers.
Sum n = -1/12
n=1
where n are natural numbers.
- Pheidippides
-
Permanent Ink Finger
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:43 pm
- 11
- Location: York, NE
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Chapter 11 discussion, "...the rich have always objected to being governed at all."all
Some prominent anarchists:
Errico Malatesta-Son of middle class landowners.
Emma Goldman-Screwed up "poor" home by any measure,
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon-Son of a bar keep
William Godwin-Bourgeoise to a fault
Mikhail Bakunin-Grew up on a family estate with 500 serfs.
I would buy the notion that they are the product of a middle class background as opposed to a wealthy one. I would agree that the "lower classes" are not typically home to that line of reasoning.
Errico Malatesta-Son of middle class landowners.
Emma Goldman-Screwed up "poor" home by any measure,
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon-Son of a bar keep
William Godwin-Bourgeoise to a fault
Mikhail Bakunin-Grew up on a family estate with 500 serfs.
I would buy the notion that they are the product of a middle class background as opposed to a wealthy one. I would agree that the "lower classes" are not typically home to that line of reasoning.
- Ptimb
-
Permanent Ink Finger
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:21 am
- 11
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: Chapter 11 discussion, "...the rich have always objected to being governed at all."all
About to go to sleep so I will have to get back to the question tomorrow but saw the heading and had to comment . While I was reading this section the thought of a Chesterton vs Ayn Rand cage match jumped into my head
-
-
- One with Books
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:30 am
- 13
- Has thanked: 2280 times
- Been thanked: 727 times
Re: Chapter 11 discussion, "...the rich have always objected to being governed at all."all
so they simply buy it like they do everything else.stahrwe wrote: the rich have always objected to being governed at all.
can't they justWealth Leads to Political Power
An outright plutocracy governed by a handful of wealthy individuals is relatively rare in the modern era. The governments of many nations, however, are heavily influenced by wealth. Wealth can buy political power through lobbying, campaign contributions, bribing and other forms of legal or illegal financial pressure. Many nations have tried to limit the influence of the wealthy through laws controlling things such as campaign finances and lobbying, but these laws can be difficult to define and enforce.
- Theomanic
-
- Agrees that Reading is Fundamental
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:34 pm
- 16
- Location: Toronto, ON
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: Chapter 11 discussion, "...the rich have always objected to being governed at all."all
I don't think there is a lot of cause for the rich to revolt or want anarchy. I can see them being Libertarians, but not anarchists. Money is power, and that includes governmental power. If they didn't have that sort if system, they would lose some of their hold. I can't imagine why they would do that. And I expect the cost of a standing army to defend yourself and your property would be pretty staggering... More than they pay in taxes, perhaps!
"Beware those who are always reading books" - The Genius of the Crowd, by Charles Bukowski
- stahrwe
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4898
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:26 am
- 14
- Location: Florida
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Chapter 11 discussion, "...the rich have always objected to being governed at all."all
Your comments are correct as far as they go. Chesterton was deeply disgusted by the corruption in the British government. His brother Cecil published a newspaper that focused on corruption. He prosecuted by the government for accusing members of Parliament of taking bribes in The Marconi Affair, The Watergate of his time. The scandal and how it was handled seemed to the Chestertons to demonstrate that the wealthy need not obey the law.
Marconi scandal
Marconi scandal
n=Infinity
Sum n = -1/12
n=1
where n are natural numbers.
Sum n = -1/12
n=1
where n are natural numbers.