Exactly!These connections I think are what makes up most of what people consider 'metaphysical'. It feels so very real, but that is simply because we've made a mental association.
![Clap :clap:](https://www.booktalk.org/images/smilies/ges_clap.gif)
As I understand it (and this is only my interpretation). The term metaphysics originally referred to the writings of Aristotle. I believe and was taught that traditionally, metaphysics refers to the branch of philosophy that attempts to understand the fundamental nature of all reality, whether visible or invisible. It seeks a description so basic, so essentially simple, so all-inclusive that it applies to everything, whether divine or human or anything else. It attempts to tell what anything must be like in order to be at all.
Therefore, to call one a metaphysician in this traditional, philosophical sense indicates nothing more than his or her interest in attempting to discover what underlies everything. Old materialists, who said that there is nothing but matter in motion, and current naturalists, who say that everything is made of lifeless, non-experiencing energy, are just as much to be classified as metaphysicians as are idealists, who maintain that there is nothing but ideas, or mind, or spirit.
There are many interpretations of metaphysics.
I think you represented your thoughts eloquently, Interbane. Bravo!