I'm not diverting attention from the subject but merely pointing out a flaw in your argument. If anything, I'm trying to help you to improve your argument. Maybe I do believe in the potential of some of that stuff, but that doesn't mean that I don't recognize when someone goes about defending their beliefs in the wrong manner. I'd say the same if one of the other participants in this conversation threw out links and had not read them.
Now you specifically said in reference to the links you posted:
And no, I have not studied them at all.
Perhaps you meant to say you hadn't read them all, which would imply you had read some of the articles you posted. That is understandable, as I'm sure those links contain a lot of information. But if you haven't studied them AT ALL, then I stand by my previous comment that those links as evidence in your argument are pointless since you cannot defend what's in them because you haven't read them.