No, he didn't.hrm... the oily? Anyway, didn't Josephus mention Jesus?
http://www.truthbeknown.com/josephus.htm
Stahrwe:
You neglect the fact that these claims have no evidence supporting them. They can be dismissed. This is not a case of 'absence of evidence is evidence of absence', since the implication that these events took place is that the laws of nature must be changed to accommodate them. Which means, the evidence against these claims are the findings of modern science, namely that the laws of nature do not allow for such magical events to happen.You neglect a few points.
1) Nothing in the account indicates that the crowd knew what was going on.&
2) There was no nightly news in that era.