Stahrwe
I am vacillating between marveling that you truly believe your rants and thinking this is just an attempted assault to minimize my opinions.
You need no help from me with this… you have singlehandedly destroyed your own credibility here and your current backpedaling will not correct your previous deceits.
Stahrwe
In the final analysis does it matter who has the disability?
Yes, especially if you try to gain sympathy or debate points by feigning the disability… and I still say that your dispute is a non issue… the blind watch by listening… they can and do (I have seen them at the movies) get quite a bit out of the dialog, even without the visual.
A blind person would have learned far more by listening to that video series than you did by refusing to.
I suppose that they are, however that is their choice (it is still a free country) and is not something you or I can control...Stahrwe
If a video is posted without a transcript you are limiting accessibility aren't you?
Your outright refusal to watch it is something that you could control… and by refusing to (and making ignorant comments as a result) you demonstrated a lack of character that is far worse than simply not creating a transcript. So this is still not a valid excuse for YOU not to watch the videos… which is what we were discussing.
Then you blindsided everyone with your deceit of a disability and insinuated (sarcastically) that I owed you some sympathy for it… at the time (and even still now) this seems to me to have been an excuse to not watch the videos and a tactic to disrupt the conversation… things spiraled downward from there… which I expect was your plan all along. You’ll take the hit for being a contemptible ass as long as we stop talking about the very convincing facts that discredit your religion.
The more I think about it the more shameful your behavior appears to me… especially now since you are trying to cover it up.
Stahrwe
Having shown that I never said I was blind let me ease your anger a bit by saying that I also never said I wasn't blind.
This is where the deceit comes into play… but you are correct you never said that you were blind, you implied it… but you are not being accused of saying it… you are being accused of insinuating it. However that is just as deceitful and is still a lie.
Stahrwe
To complete the discussion let me say that I WAS blind, and that I have publicly proclaimed that hundreds of times. Finally, it was and is true that I Once Was Blind. Anyone familiar with Christianity since Newton will immediately fill in the ending phrase of that quote and understand the context in which I use and used it.
Then why would you need my sympathy? Your excuses reek of the attempt to create one lie to cover another… your behavior is becoming more and more contemptible.
This excuse fails on several levels… That particular “doctrine” does not fit into the conversion we had, nor is it a valid excuse for not watching the videos… and again it does not explain why you would need any sympathy, or why you talked about DragonSpeech, or why you (up until now) have been restricting your comments to the actual sight impaired type of blindness.Stahrwe
It was no insinuation, nor am I backpedaling now, it is just a bit of Christian doctrine which you all failed to recognize.
You FAIL… again
I have no interest in answering a moral query posted by someone who obviously has none… this is not what we were discussing and it is not what I am commenting on here. Besides, Interbane answered it already.Stahrwe
The moral question has not been answered and one cannot use logic to answer it. There is a basic factor missing which renders logic unreliable to answer the question. Do you know what the factor is?
Later