Grim: "Yes, and in this arguement are the dissenting atheists any better than the religious believer, merely lower themselves to the level where an arugment is validated in some way by opinion?"
I'm sure some atheists believe without using critical thinking skills, as do a certain number from any belief. The atheistic stance, however, doesn't need an argument. It is more by default, as Chris says.
-
In total there are 80 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 79 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1086 on Mon Jul 01, 2024 9:03 am
Anti-Christian Bias in American Society
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
- Interbane
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
- 19
- Location: Da U.P.
- Has thanked: 1105 times
- Been thanked: 2166 times
- Grim
-
- Brilliant
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:59 pm
- 15
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
However; the dispostional belief you mention, correctly, suggests a strong correlation to the feelings of certainty - a decidedly equally unreasonable functioning of the healthy human brain than belief. Certainty to a degree which is required for evolution (haha I kid)!! Seriously though I think one of Robert Burtons main points was that feelings of the dispositional belief variety are required for normal functioning in a world where our understanding of the surroundings is less than perfect. It was also interesting that you mentioned belief being grounded in a reality that is not based on critical thinking and is irrational, or non-scientific if you will. An interesting stipulation that alludes to the need for certainty.
Perhaps those who argue loudest against, or in favour of religion require a certainty they nuerologically are lacking? Evolutionarly speaking of course (zing)!!
![Book :book:](https://www.booktalk.org/images/smilies/ext_book.gif)
Perhaps those who argue loudest against, or in favour of religion require a certainty they nuerologically are lacking? Evolutionarly speaking of course (zing)!!
![Book :book:](https://www.booktalk.org/images/smilies/ext_book.gif)
- Interbane
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
- 19
- Location: Da U.P.
- Has thanked: 1105 times
- Been thanked: 2166 times
I think we need certainty, or at least the option of summarization that it gives us. We can't be uncertain of everything, or we'd have so many loose ends and unanswered questions we'd go insane. These dispositional beliefs, keep in mind, are beliefs we aren't aware of, or haven't focused our mind's eye on for analytical due diligence.
- Interbane
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
- 19
- Location: Da U.P.
- Has thanked: 1105 times
- Been thanked: 2166 times
- Interbane
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
- 19
- Location: Da U.P.
- Has thanked: 1105 times
- Been thanked: 2166 times