For all your talk about rights, it doesn't sound like you're describing rights.
So women should have the "right" to choose, so long as it doesn't depend on "Social, educational, financial, and personal considerations"? How is that a right to anything?Grand Moff Vixen wrote:Social, educational, financial, and personal considerations alone do not outweigh the value of the life that is in the fetus.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](https://www.booktalk.org/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
I also don't necessarily agree with your promotion of adoption as a preferable alternative to abortion. There's already an over-abundance of unwanted children, for which it is extremely difficult to find qualified parents for. Unnecessarily adding to that feels more socially irresponsible to me, as it means a lower quality of life for those children than they deserve, as opposed to simply never existing, with no knowledge or awareness that they ever could have existed. Wrap your brain around that before responding.