Frank 013 wrote:Stahrwe
What exactly do you mean by 'manifest'? What does chronological age have to do with spiritual maturity? What are you basing these premises on? As I read your question it is unintelligible. "... our time as humans is equal to infancy?" What?
Wow your dense… if my soul is eternal and is created at conception (as is claimed by many theists) and my soul is eternal according to those same theists… then my 80 or so years on earth would be only the tiniest first (minuscule) part of my whole “spiritual” existence… according to the belief as I understand it.
But you are wrong. The idea is that human life begins at conception. My soul, your soul and the soul of people who have not yet been born were all created during the creation week so all human souls are the same age.
frank013 wrote:If we can continue to experience and learn after death then our short span in our bodies is only the tiniest fraction of our overall existence. Right?
Once again you are wrong. Human learning ends at the end of physical life.
You also don't understand the concept of eternity. Time ends. Eternity is outside of time so to claim that the time in our bodies is only a fraction of our overall existence is incorrect. The concepts are not relatable.
Frank013 wrote:That being said… a person’s time on earth would be the equivalent of their first micro second of conception in human terms. By the time we die as old people (assuming we make it that far) we have barely begun to exist in spiritual terms… according to your belief anyway
Incorrect, see above.
frank013 wrote:Which makes us less than infants spiritually... follow now?
You don't know what you are talking about.
Stahrwe
Dawn is correct but once again you err because you have not read the book you are so apt (though not adept at criticizing).
frank013 wrote:Dawn is correct according to you and a few others… and not to the people I trust... most people on this planet do not believe what you do and, as I have told you (again and again) I have read the bible… don’t be so dense.
There is a difference between reading passages here and there and actually reading for understanding. If you indeed have 'read' the Bible you weren't paying much attention as you demonstrate a lack of knowledge and understanding of the simpliest of it.
Stahrwe
I call shenanigans on this. You have varied the quote. The toddler would demonstrate willful disobedience if he/she said, I don't believe you but that is not what you say is it. WHat you say, again using the toddler analogy is, "You aren't my Father," to God.
Frank013 wrote:Ok, so if despite the evidence (which there is in the case of most parents but not for god) say your kid had said “you’re not my father! That’s impossible!) at say 3 years old…
I was expanding on your example.
frank013 wrote:As a loving father which path would you take?
Would you condemn him to horrible torture forever?
He begged you time after time to choose to be with Him. Should He kidnap you and hold you against your will. If given a choice at the judgement, even knowing what is in store for them the rebellious would choose separation from God. Don't make this about God, this is your choice.
frank013 wrote:or
Would you try to show him the truth?
I suppose you (like your god) would let the child wallow in ignorance and then punish saying “your brothers don’t ask questions like that! what I say is good enough for them so take it or leave it!”
You really think that’s fair?
I believe at this point that you are belaboring an issue which has been proposed and answered over and over.
Romans 1:20 (New International Version, ©2011)
20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
Stahrwe
If you chose to deny god is your father, He is not condemning you, you are doing it to yourself by rejecting Him. (Admittedly an oversimplification, but then I am dealing with an infant aren't I by your own admission?)
frank013 wrote:Well according to the math… my 42 years of infinity… I would be an infant… or even a fetus… but that is your belief, not mine.
I cannot reject someone who has made no offer that I can detect… save your book for the fiction section… I find nothing godly there… as I have said before it is beneath me and lacking in everything I need to believe.
See above rebuttal about infant - nonsense, and the quote from Romans about knowledge.
Stahrwe
You are doing exactly what Adam did in the Garden. When asked why he sinned Adam replied, "the woman YOU GAVE me ..." In other words it was God's fault that Adam was guilty.
frank013 wrote:And I would agree that it was… god should have known what would happen according to your logic… yet he placed the temptation out anyway… if he truly loved his children he should have protected them until they really understood the consequences… any parent would do at least that much.
Once again you are trying to blame God. He doesn't work that way and even if He did, temptation is not the same as forcing disobedience and even if you disobey there is a solution.
Stahrwe
Is it God's fault that you reject Him? He should have left more evidence. He should have been cleared. He should have jumpted through the hoops I required Him to for me to believe Sorry, it doesn't work that way. Billions of people find the evidence compelling. It's your decision.
frank013 wrote:first of all I am not those billions of people... and there are many others like me... so it is his fault if he will not show himself in a way he knows I (we) need to be able to see him… for an all powerful and loving being this should be no effort whatsoever… no “hoops” as you say… and well worth the effort if he loved us. For god to simply lay down the law as you claim makes him petty, inflexible and unjust. His priorities are off too… that is if he is truly good anyway.
you are blaming God and trying to manipulate Him at the same time. If He gave into your demands you would cite that as evidence against Him. You need some new material. Whatever hack you got this spiel from is really old, out of date school.
Stahrwe
What behavior are you referring to? You make no sense.
frank013 wrote:Condemning people to hell for eternity for a non-criminal act… a simple lack of belief… see the proposed situation above.
Do you have anything original. How many times are you going to repeat this idea? Are you trying to fill space or wear me down?
OK, I have the time and patience so here goes again:
Criminal???? What criminal act. Also, as explained above He is not condemning you. You have the choice, you make the choice. If the evidence is not sufficient for you again, that is not God's job to meet your demands. As I said before, there will be some at the final judgement, when there is no doubt that God is real and the lost are staring at the abyss that is separation from God, the lost will choose that separation. The will condemn themselves.
Stahrwe
No one is condemned for infractions major or minor. Forgiveness is offered. It's there for everyone but you have to take it according to the offer. By refusing to do so you choose the consequences; essentually you are condemning yourself by choosing to remain separated from God instead of being His. Why does that upset you?
frank013 wrote:It does not upset me… I am very calm…
![Smile :)](https://www.booktalk.org/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
My questions are moral in nature and god if he exists is lacking… my assertion is that you willingly worship a monster if he is as described in the bible… the description that you are giving me is like a stubborn boss with a “my way or the highway” attitude… that is not someone most people like or even respect.
Once again you are wrong. You haven't read the Bible. It is more like, "Hey, I love you come with me and I will care for you." And you say "'Expletive deleted' I don't want anything to do with you and you, YOU, Frank013, goes on his way. You choose your way God doesn't do it for you.
Stahrwe
You don't believe in God. You don't want to have anything to do with Him now; why would you want to spend eternity with Him?
frank013 wrote:It’s not what I want or don’t want, it’s what I can perceive… I cannot perceive god with the available material.
Then something is blocking your view.
Stahrwe
You want to spend eternity separated from Him and that is what you are going to get so be happy that God is giving you what you want. For those of us who want to be His, we want to spend eternity with Him so both of us get what we want. The only loser in the mix is God, because He wants you with Him but He won't force you.
frank013 wrote:Showing yourself is not forcing… you assume that if god were real that we would not want to meet him? I suppose that depends… if he is love than I would… if the bible is correct, then you are right I wouldn’t. But as I said, this is not about what I want… it’s about what I see… and I do not see god.
The Children of Israel could see a manifestation of God and the rebellious ones still refused to follow Him. Seeing Him, the way you demand, is not the answer. On the other hand, pleanty of us do know Him personally.
Stahrwe
Having heard the above lament essentially word for word from the atheist camp, I suspect it is one of the bricks in the wall you try to build. Too bad it doesn't work. No matter how many of these bricks you have, they won't save you.
frank013 wrote:Save me from what exactly? In one sentence you say that I get what I want and only god looses… now I need saving?
From what?
Later
Eternal separation from God.